Monday, May 20, 2019
Reservation Policy and Indian Constitution Essay
I. foundation garmentThe spirit of coupleity pervades the provides of the institution of India, as the main aim of the founders of the temperament was to puddle an egalitarian nightclub wherein social, economic and political justice prevailed and equality of precondition and chance be made getable to alone. However, owing to historical and traditional reasons, certain phasees of Indian citizens are under severe social and economic disabilities so that they cannot effectively enjoy either equality of status or of probability. Therefore the Constitution accords to these weaker sections of society protective discrimination in various articles, including Article 15(4). This clause empowers the state, notwithstanding boththing to the contrary inArticles 15(1) and 29(2), to start out circumscribed arriere pensee for the advancement of any soci entirelyy and educationally unwilling classes of citizens or for plan castes and schedule tribes.Cast based arriere pensee sy stem in IndiaAn ordinary form of long-ago discrimination, inside military personnel in India is the carry out of untouchability. Scheduled Castes (SCs) are the main targets of this medieval put into practice a practice which is banned by the Constitution of India (Basu, Durga Das (2008) an untouched human being is measured, contaminated or a lesser human. Though during the Vedic period a persons Varna (not caste) was clean up by his/ her socio-economic duties these duties were either of your own accord performed or were assigned by the local anesthetic superintendent , and varna was to begin with not clear by ones birth into any exacting family. Nevertheless, over the long time Caste has been defined by ones birth.The Government in recognition to the peripheral status of the marginalized social communities has consistently promulgated various legislations and statutes, which are influenced by ii main considerations, namely a. to vote down the multiple deprivations of the margina lized social groups inherited from exclusion in the past, and to the extent possible bring them at equivalence with the an early(a)wise(prenominal)s and b. to provide protection against exclusion and discrimination in the present by encouraging their effective confederacy in the general economic, social and political processes of the country.Towards these ends, the Government of India had utilized two-fold strategies, which includei) anti-discriminatory and protective measuresii) development and empowering measures.The prolongation of the qualification polity in India to the marginalized social groups is primarily drawn from much(prenominal) considerations and is only applicable to the human beings domain. As such, the vast private sector, which comprises of a sizable section of the marginalized social groups, remains outside the prospect of the reservation policy.Reservation in India is a form of affirmative action designed to improve the offbeat of perceived backward an d under-represented communities defined primarily by their caste (quota-system based on gender or religion) is a phenomenon that commenced with the coming into force of the Indian Constitution (the Constitution initially provided reservation to Christians, with the supply that it would automatically reduce gradually with the efflux of time) however, lately preferential treatment on regional posterior has either been non-statutorily introduced in the educational institutes (e.g. eligibility conditions for candidates from outside the State are 5% higher than that for the locals, as per local rules prescribed by certain Universities) or is being advocated in twain jobs and lowly professions like auto-rickshaw-drivers).The to the highest degree important stated aim of the Indian reservation system is to boost the opportunities for improved social and enlightening position of the underprivileged communities and, thus, allow them to take their equitable place in the conventional of Indian society. The reservation scheme exists to provide opportunities for the members of the SCs and STs to increase their representation in the State Legislatures, the executive appendage of the Union and States, the grasp force, schools, colleges, and other public institutions. (Financial Support, 0ct 2011). The Constitution of India states in Article 15(4) All citizens shall nonplus equal opportunities of receiving education. cryptograph herein contained shall preclude the State from providing special facilities for educationally backward sections (not communities) of the population. Emphasis and parentheses added. It also states that The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of society (in particular, of the schedule castes and aboriginal tribes), and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation. The Article further states that nothing in Article 15(4) will prevent the nation from helping SCs and STs for their progress betterment up to the level enjoyed by the average member of other communities. ( Laskar, Mehbubul Hassan 2011).In 1982, the Constitution condition 15% and 7.5% of vacancies in publicsector and government-aided educational institutes as a quota reserved for the SC and ST candidates independently for a period of five years, after which the quota system would be reviewed. This period was routinely extended by the succeeding governments. The Supreme Court of India ruled that reservations cannot exceed 50% (which it judged would violate equal access guaranteed by the Constitution) and put a cap on reservations. However, there are state laws that exceed this 50% doctor and these are under litigation in the Supreme Court. For example, the caste-based reservation stands at 69% and the same is applicable to about 87% of the population in the State of Tamil Nadu. In 1990, Prime Minister V. P. Singh proclaimed that 27% of government positions would be counter sink aside for OBCs in addition to the 22.5% already set aside for the SCs and STs.(The Struggle for Equality in India 2002).In the Indra Sawhney baptismal font, honble Supreme Court also held that reservation in forward motion is unconstitutional but permitted the reservation,for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to continue for a period offive years(From 16.11.92). Consequent to this, the Constitution was amended by the Constitution (Seventy-seventh Amendment) Act, 1995 and Article 16(4-A) was incorporated. This Article enables the State to provide for reservation, in matters of promotion, in favor of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The fact that the words Backward class used in Article 16(4) have been instituted in Article 16(4-A) by the words SCs & STs, itself precludes consideration of making reservation in promotion in favour of any other category of citizens.II. Constitutional ProvisionsThe main objective of the Indian reservation system is to increase the opportunities for enhanced social and educational status (in the reek better than the previous until it becomes equal to that enjoyed by an average member of other communities) of the underprivileged communities and, thus, enable them to take their rightful place in the mainstream of Indian society. The reservation system exists to provide opportunities for the members of the SCs and STs to increase their representation in the state Legislative, the Executive harmonium of the Union (Centre) and States, thelabour force, schools, colleges, and other public institutions.The exact necessities for the reservation in go in favour of the members of the SC/STs have been made in the Constitution of India. They are as follows Article 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution enabled both the state and Central Governments to reserve seats in public services for the members of the SC and ST, thereby, enshrining impartiality of opportunity in matters of civic service.Article 15(4) states that Noth ing in this Article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class or citizens, which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State.Article 16(4 A) states that Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provisions for reservation in the matter of promotion to any class or classes of posts in the services under the State in favour of SCs and STs which in the opinion of the State are not adequately represented under the State(Constitutional 77th Amendment, Act, 1995).Article 16 (4 B) states that Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from considering any unfilled vacancies of a year which are reserved for being filled up in that year in accordance with any provision for reservation made under clause (4) or clause (4A) as a separate class of vacancies to be filled up in any succeeding year or years and such class of vacancies shall not be considered together with the vacancies of the year in which they are being filled up for determining the ceiling of fifty percent reservation on total number of vacancies of that year (Constitutional 81st Amendment, Act, 2000).The Constitution prohibits discrimination (Article 15) of any citizen on grounds of religion, race, caste, etc. untouchability (Article 17) and forced labour (Article 23). It provides for specific representation by means of reservation of seats for the SCs and the STs in the Parliament (Article 330) and in the State Legislative Assemblies (Article 332), as well as, inGovernment and public sector jobs, in both the federal and state Governments (Articles 16(4), 330(4) and 335). (Sukhadeo Thorat and Chittaranjan Senapati 2006).III. Impact of reservation policy on employment and educationAs may be evident from the particulars in the earlier paragraphs, the schema of reservation had a helpful effect in conditions of induction of plan castes, schedule tr ibes and other backward classes into public sector employment and in educational institutions. However, their accessible share in employment and educational institutions still falls short of the target in certain categories of jobs and higher education. The target in the case of Groups D and C are close to the population mark of 15 per cent for scheduled castes and 7.5 % for scheduled tribes but fall short in Groups A and B. As against this, the true position regarding the representation of other backward classes in central services is not available.However, as stated in para 6.4, in the All India works and central services for which employment is made through the Union Public Service Commission, representation of other backward classes is very near to their share. With the growth in the share of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in public services, it had positive multiple effects on the social and economic situation of these two disadvantaged groups. The data provided by the ministry of personnel indicates that in recent years the vacancies reserved for the scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other backward classes are being filled fully even in the elite services at the centre.Reservation did not provide equal opportunities within individually group/community to all beneficiaries. Consequently, different castes and tribes within a group/community have not benefited from reservation equally. Almost in all categories of beneficiaries among scheduled castes, scheduled tribes or other backward classes and minorities, there is a growing sense of deprivation amongst different categories, which is leading to internal dissension. For example*, in Punjab, the Valmiki Samaj is asking for a separate quota of reservations on the ground that Ramadasis and Mazbis have cornered the benefits. Likewise, Chamars in Uttar Pradesh and Mahars inMaharashtra are said to have benefited from the reservations more than other castes identified in the schedule from these regi ons. Similar accusations have been made against the Meena community by other scheduled tribes.Problems of this kind are manifold in the case of other backward classes, as in each state there are overriding groups, usually with economic and political clout, who reap the benefits of reservations. There are Ezhavas in Kerala, Nadars and Thevars in Tamil Nadu, Vokkalligas and Lingayats in Karnataka, Lodhs and Koeris in Central India, Yadavs and Kurmis in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh and Jats in Rajasthan, which, despite their dominant status, have been clubbed as backward classes eligible for benefits under reservations. For these reasons, reservation has become a contentious know today, more so when it is applied to other backward classes.Reservations alone are not enough to mainstream the SCs and the STs to the levels of the other sections of the society. The system of reservations meant to uplift the weaker sections, has in fact, succeeded in the creation of creamy layers within the mar ginalized social groups to the extent that the infiltration of the benefits have been marginal and differentially accessed. The vision of Ambedkar, Phule, Periyar, and Sahuji Maharaj, as initially envisioned under the aegis of the reservation policy and reforms in the structure of governance was to completely negate the deleterious impacts of caste-based discrimination and exclusion.The idea was to create fissures in the hegemonic hold of the immutable status of the higher castes over public services. Therefore, the historicity of reservations included firstly, the amelioration in the relative position of the lower castes, and two, restructuring of the institutionalized social relationships in the Indian society on participatory lines.Instead of giving power/authority to less efficient candidate, reservation should provide better opportunity of study to weaker/backward section of the society to compete with unreserved class by way of whirl more resources to the weaker class so tha t they could defeat the Generals.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.